Thank You Paul Martin
I was very happy the day that the Rt. Hon. Paul Martin named Roméo Dallaire to the Senate. I thought that Dallaire was an excellent choice, a non-partisan with undeniable credibility to speak to issues of international human rights and genocide. I still think that he was an excellent choice.
I'm also a big fan of super-partisan senators like the late Royce Frith, but that's a post for another time...
The reason why I post about Senator Dallaire today is because of some undeserved coverage in the Toronto Star. Dallaire has made a perfectly reasonable argument - that international law must apply to all countries, and that the credibility of those who champion human rights is damaged when their home countries allow those rights to be violated.
The author of the Star piece, however, ran with the title "Dallaire compares U.S. actions to those of terrorists." And that would be a perfectly good, inflammatory, anti-american, copy-selling, attention-grabbing title - except for one thing. At no point is Dallaire quoted using the word "terrorist."
So, Michelle Shephard of the Toronto Star, the next time someone asks you why there isn't a substantive debate in this country on any subject political, you can point to your article here. You've taken an old man's reasonable plea that Canada should support human rights and international law in the world, and you've twisted it to be nonsensical. "Terrosists?" Really? Did he compare George Bush to Osama bin Laden? Hardly.
And the next time someone argues to me that the Senate must be obliterated, I'll remind them about Senator Dallaire. Appointed by Prime Minister Martin, he'll stand up for international law and human rights, even if the Canada's New Government won't.
Félicitations, Général.
I'm also a big fan of super-partisan senators like the late Royce Frith, but that's a post for another time...
The reason why I post about Senator Dallaire today is because of some undeserved coverage in the Toronto Star. Dallaire has made a perfectly reasonable argument - that international law must apply to all countries, and that the credibility of those who champion human rights is damaged when their home countries allow those rights to be violated.
The author of the Star piece, however, ran with the title "Dallaire compares U.S. actions to those of terrorists." And that would be a perfectly good, inflammatory, anti-american, copy-selling, attention-grabbing title - except for one thing. At no point is Dallaire quoted using the word "terrorist."
So, Michelle Shephard of the Toronto Star, the next time someone asks you why there isn't a substantive debate in this country on any subject political, you can point to your article here. You've taken an old man's reasonable plea that Canada should support human rights and international law in the world, and you've twisted it to be nonsensical. "Terrosists?" Really? Did he compare George Bush to Osama bin Laden? Hardly.
And the next time someone argues to me that the Senate must be obliterated, I'll remind them about Senator Dallaire. Appointed by Prime Minister Martin, he'll stand up for international law and human rights, even if the Canada's New Government won't.
Félicitations, Général.



6 Comments:
Check out Kady's postings and links on this issue.
http://blog.macleans.ca/category/blogs/national/inside-the-queensway/
Here is a repost of what I left on Kady's blog yesterday........
Don Neuman’s Politics just ran the clip.
After watching Jason Kenney attack Dallaire just now … I just despair for this country.
Sooo typical of the thug-smear style that has come to pass as politics. He sounds like the worst of the Republican attack dogs, almost frothing at the mouth… and these guys get to do it all under a stolen brand: “Conservative”
Dallaire was amazing and stuck to his point about child soldiers ignoring the clumsy smear.
Will good people like him want to speak out if they get ripped up by Harper’s henchmen?
...... And I note that the Toronto Star fell for Kenney's BS. Shame on them!
I too say thank you to Paul Martin as he gave seniors a 31 dollar a month raise in our GIS payment l8 dollars in Jan 2005 and the rest in 2006 January for which this lousy government i,.e.the liar Monte Solberg takes credit for every time he stands up and talk about seniors...what a bunch of liars....signed gramps
Before you start reporter bashing, Jimbo, understand that Michelle might not have wrote that headline. Not all papers give that responsibility to their reporters. Often, deskers (editors) do that.
I understand she leads the article with basically the same line (bad form, by the way) but also, it could have been a paraphrase. For example, Dallaire may have compared the US and terrorists in a long, politically fancy string of sentences, which seems to be the case as it says he only uses this description in the cases of detainees at Guantanamo.
Dallaire has made a good point. I agree with it. So how is it undeserved coverage?
Any good reporter and editor would make damn sure the lead was proper and accurate, even if it was paraphrased.
I agree my friend. Any good reporter would.
The word you're looking for is lede. L.E.D.E.
Yes I thought it was undeserved.
I use "lead." It's acceptable to use both.
酒店兼差
酒店打工
酒店經紀
酒店小姐
酒店兼職
酒店上班
禮服店
假日打工
台北酒店經紀
童裝批發
童裝批發
童裝
童裝
酒店喝酒
暑假打工
寒假打工
酒店
酒店經紀人
酒店現領
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home